My
dad often says that life is never a constant; that it is a series of successes
and failures. One day you win, the other day you may not. However, the key is
not to panic when you fail. Rather, look back at your actions and learn from
your mistakes. It is unforgivable that a failure is not taken as an
opportunity for improvement.
England’s tour of UAE has been an excellent reminder of the lesson that dad always taught me. After a 3-0 whitewash in the test series, no cricket pundit gave England a chance in the ODIs. The odds were stacked heavily against them. England took this as an opportunity to re-assess their game and played with more resolve and determination to come out on top as the better side.
Most experts suggest that a team is the embodiment of their coach’s personality. All great men fight harder when the going gets tough and good coaches have the skill to instill in their players the confidence and willingness to win. No other team is a better example of this than England.
Ever since Mohsin Khan has taken over as Pakistan’s coach, Pakistan has tasted success. But the real test of a coach is when his soldiers are down, wounded and shattered in confidence. This is a testing time for Mohsin Khan and Misbah ul Haq. Imran Khan would probably tell you the same: A great leader is one who has the ability to stand up and fight, especially when the chips are down.
It is true that Pakistan were beaten by England in every department: batting, bowling, fielding and most importantly captaincy. But it is important to analyze every aspect of Pakistan’s defeat to learn why England did well and why Pakistan surrendered so easily.
This week Cricketing Minds has analyzed the 4-0 whitewash of the Pakistan team against England.
England’s tour of UAE has been an excellent reminder of the lesson that dad always taught me. After a 3-0 whitewash in the test series, no cricket pundit gave England a chance in the ODIs. The odds were stacked heavily against them. England took this as an opportunity to re-assess their game and played with more resolve and determination to come out on top as the better side.
Most experts suggest that a team is the embodiment of their coach’s personality. All great men fight harder when the going gets tough and good coaches have the skill to instill in their players the confidence and willingness to win. No other team is a better example of this than England.
Ever since Mohsin Khan has taken over as Pakistan’s coach, Pakistan has tasted success. But the real test of a coach is when his soldiers are down, wounded and shattered in confidence. This is a testing time for Mohsin Khan and Misbah ul Haq. Imran Khan would probably tell you the same: A great leader is one who has the ability to stand up and fight, especially when the chips are down.
It is true that Pakistan were beaten by England in every department: batting, bowling, fielding and most importantly captaincy. But it is important to analyze every aspect of Pakistan’s defeat to learn why England did well and why Pakistan surrendered so easily.
This week Cricketing Minds has analyzed the 4-0 whitewash of the Pakistan team against England.
Batting
The graphs below show
the total runs Pakistan and England scored and total wickets lost in different
stages of the game.
England dominated the first 10 overs by scoring 203 runs for
the loss of just 1 wicket in the 4 ODIs combined at 5.075 runs per over. Once
known as the best in the business for picking up early wickets, Pakistan are
now struggling in the fast bowling department. England on the other hand has
found an excellent opening partner in Pietersen for Cook.
During the same stage of the game, English bowlers were able to pick up 8 Pakistani wickets at a cost of 169 runs only. It matters less that 4 of these wickets came in the first ODI itself and Finn was the chief destroyer, picking up 6 of these wickets. Once again that shows how superior the English fast bowlers performed compared to their counterparts when it came to utilizing the new ball.
During the same stage of the game, English bowlers were able to pick up 8 Pakistani wickets at a cost of 169 runs only. It matters less that 4 of these wickets came in the first ODI itself and Finn was the chief destroyer, picking up 6 of these wickets. Once again that shows how superior the English fast bowlers performed compared to their counterparts when it came to utilizing the new ball.
Surprisingly Pakistan did slightly better than England
between overs 11-20 where Pakistan scored 7 less runs but more importantly lost
3 less wickets too.
This is the stage when Misbah employed his strike bowlers Afridi and Ajmal who were able to contain England and also pick up wickets. But Pakistan was unable to maintain the pressure in the next stage.
This is the stage when Misbah employed his strike bowlers Afridi and Ajmal who were able to contain England and also pick up wickets. But Pakistan was unable to maintain the pressure in the next stage.
In ODIs, the most important phase of the game is the middle
stage (Overs 21-35) where a game is usually decided. Unfortunately for Pakistan
they lost 12 wickets during this stage of the game which had a major impact on
their runrate as well. England on the other hand mastered the middle stage play
with the bat by scoring over 300 runs for the loss of just 2 wickets at 5.02
RPO.
For Pakistan to win ODI games, their batsmen have to put a higher price on their wickets and place an importance of occupying the crease during these middle overs. Their only decent performance during this stage of the game came in the 3 rd ODI when they scored 68 runs for the loss of only 1 wicket.
Because Pakistan had already made a mess of their batting by the end of the 35 th over, the following stages mattered less because by the start of the 36th over (mostly with the batting powerplay) Pakistan would be at least 4 wickets down already. [Breakdown of Pak’s scores at the end of 35th over: 130/10, 151/4, 157/5 and 153/4].
Entering
the batting powerplay and last 10 overs with 4-5 wickets down restricts the
batsmen to play their shots and not make the best use of the fielding
restrictions. Hence, only two things can happen as a result: (i) Your batsmen
play too many shots to accelerate and lose wickets as a result OR (ii) Play
defensive cricket and let the run rate to drop even further which puts extra
pressure to accelerate during last 10 overs.
The
best way to counter this problem would be to keep at least 7-8 wickets in hand when
entering the last 15 overs. Which is exactly what England did and hence they
were successful throughout. [Breakdown of Eng’s scores at the end of 35th
over: 169/2, 154/2, 203/1 and 158/4].
Analysis of
boundaries hit
This table shows the % of runs scored in boundaries by each
batsman. It must be a shame for Umar
Akmal to sit at the bottom of this table despite being known for his aggressive
nature. I am not surprised to see Malik and Misbah at the bottom as well. Malik
has not been able to middle the ball ever since his forceful comeback. Misbah
on the other hand needs to find innovative ways to score more boundaries and
rotate the strike in ODIs rather than his usual ‘tuk-tuk’. Defensive play may bring him success in Tests, but Mohali
2011 should have been a lesson for him that the ‘tuk-tuk’ strategy mostly fails in ODIs.
Partnerships are crucial in any format of cricket. I am not
sure why the Pakistan
batsmen fail to acknowledge the importance of partnerships in ODIs. Pakistan’s best
partnership came in the last ODI when Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq added 111 for
the 2nd wicket. What is noteworthy here is that there were only 4
50+ partnerships for Pakistan
during the 4 ODIs. Whereas, England
had 9 50+ partnerships.
Ajmal has been Pakistan’s standout bowler. But if
there is some area of improvement for him then that is ‘extras’. World's No 1 ODI Bowler will not be proud of being at the top of this list.
Pakistan’s
fast bowlers’ lack of ability to pick up early wickets has already been
mentioned as a reason for concern. But they also need to work on their wides
and no-balls, especially Wahab Riaz who conceded 5 extras in just 7 overs.
This table shows the percentage of maidens bowled by the
Pakistani and English bowlers during the 4 ODIs. The top four slots are
occupied by the English bowlers. This shows that despite favorable conditions
the Pakistani bowlers were unable to choke the English batsmen by drying up the
runs. The strategy of containing opposition batsmen and drying up the flow of
runs was successful against Zimbabwe,
Sri Lanka and Bangladesh last
year. However, against quality batsmen such as Cook, Pietersen and Trott this
strategy was clearly difficult to implement. Hence, Pakistan needs to think of other
strategies to pick up wickets.
Other interesting
stats
Pakistan
averaged 20.48 runs per wicket and 27.6 balls per wicket which is extremely
poor and reflects inconsistency and the fact that the batsmen were unable to
build partnerships. England
should be commended for their efforts with the ball throughout the 4 ODIs.
Pakistan
can take pride in dropping fewer catches than England. Umar Akmal dropped Cook
off Afridi in the 2nd ODI and Azhar Ali dropped Pietersen in the 3rd
ODI. Both of them went on to score match winning centuries. Umar Akmal also
missed a stumping chance of Bopara in the 1st ODI who went on to
build a century partnership with captain Cook.
England
dropped 5 catches: Patel dropped Afridi in the 1st ODI. Broad
couldn’t hold on to a tough chance offered again by Afridi in 2nd
ODI. Kieswetter did an Akmal when he dropped Umar Akmal in 3rd ODI.
Cook and Pietersen were guilty of dropping Rahman and Misbah in the last
ODI.
Conclusion
Conclusion
Pakistan
failed to perform with the bat, ball and most importantly with the mind.
Perhaps, Misbah can learn from Jayawardne who is being appreciated and rewarded
for his aggressive captaincy and field settings despite having weaker bowling
resources.
Here is something for your food for thought: It were these
same English batsmen who struggled on the same surface against the same bowlers
a few days ago when the field was up. So what changed during these few days?
The answer to that question in my opinion is “defensive
captaincy”. Feel free to share your opinion with us and the answer to the above
food for thought question.
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CricketingMinds
